Category: Austin (Page 209 of 318)

Adometry Dominates the Marketing Analytics Market

By AMY MCCULLOUGH
Reporter with Silicon Hills News

Photo of CEO Paul Pellman.

Photo of CEO Paul Pellman.

While the science behind Austin’s Adometry might be complex, the company’s goals are simple: To help marketing executives answer the questions, “How’s my marketing doing?” and “What should I do different?”

Sales executives have Salesforce.com. Financial executives have Oracle Financials. But marketing officers have never had a single, digital dashboard to help them assess their business efforts. Enter Adometry.

Adometry specializes in “channel attribution” and helps more than 60 clients—including Citigroup, eBay, KIA, Levi’s and Mitsubishi—determine which marketing tactics lead which customers to the point of sale.

Chief Marketing Officer Casey Carey explained: “We capture all of what we call ‘marketing event data,’ and that is information we can get about which ads, which e-mails, which search terms you were exposed to and the actions or non-actions that were associated with those exposures. … So whether it’s a credit card application, or a purchase in store, or a scheduled test drive for a car, we marry that up with conversion data and associated cost data and answer the question, ‘How’s my marketing doing?’ To put it in context, we’re processing about 20 billion marketing events per month right now for our customers.”

All this data gives Adometry insight into what their clients should do differently. For example, one client, a big box hobby and craft retailer, recently learned it should shift money in its marketing budget to different channels to increase sales without having to make big, new investments.

The client “didn’t believe in display advertising,” Carey said. “They were spending a whole lot of money on paid search. They did not believe that display was a good place for their money. Most of their advertising is Sunday circulars in the newspapers. They were investing quite a bit of money online in paid search. We brought the point of sale transactions in, ran our model, and came back and said: ‘Did you look at your digital marketing and how it’s driving sales at the point of sale?.’ Your search performance is awful; it’s not helping at all. It is money wasted. That was a major insight for them. But even more interestingly, of both the conversions that occurred at point of sale that we could attribute to digital media, 68 percent of them were influenced by a display ad. That basically said they were way underinvested in display, and there’s a huge opportunity to reconsider that. They actually took two weeks and stopped their free-standing inserts in Sunday papers and moved that money into display.”

A satisfied Adometry customer in the agency category is Dallas-based Adaptive Audience, a media trading company that seeks to fill the void between advertising technology and digital marketing strategy.

Much of Adaptive Audience’s work is aimed at retailers, and President Brandon Bethea said Adometry has been a “game-changer” for his company. Adometry data helps them track the specific channel mix that best targets certain client customers for both on- and offline sales. “We’re tagging everything at such a granular level that I’m actually able to see: Is it that (market) segment? Which channel did they reach? And within that channel, which targeting tactic? What key word search or what targeting type in display, or what publisher in display … That helps us optimize the total media budget so we can allocate more of our budget to those tactics that are working,” he said. “This simply wouldn’t be possible without Adometry.”

Senior management team in place

Adometry has passed the early startup stage and transitioned from a founder-led model to leadership from a well-rounded senior management team. Investor Austin Ventures says the company now has the technology as well as the leadership to aggressively move forward.

Austin Ventures General Partner Tom Ball said: “I think for the first time, at the end of 2013, we kind of had all the pieces in place with respect to the management team … We’ve always had the vision for what the product needs to be. The product is in a really solid place right now. We feel it’s a great time for them to be aggressive and step on the gas here and continue. They’re already the leader in this space. We want to make sure they increase their lead on the competition. … Sometimes, when things are so technical, it’s actually quite hard to sell, because you’re selling science. And these guys have figured out how to make it simpler. … We have the full senior team now.”

Relatively new senior team hires include Carey, Vice President of Sales Paul Dodd, and Vice President of Client Services Nikhil Kumar.

Austin Ventures has been with Adometry since the beginning. The firm provided $500,000 in seed money to Adometry, back when it was called Click Forensics. Overall, Austin Ventures has invested about $10 million in Adometry.

Click Forensics was founded in 2007 in San Antonio with a series A funding from Austin Ventures and Shasta Ventures and receive series B funding from Sierra Ventures in 2008, for a total of around $21 million. It focused on reducing the click fraud that burned up dollars spent on Google Adwords campaigns. As Google began tackling click fraud in 2011, Click Forensics bought then-Washington-based Adometry to launch its suite of online marketing analytics.

Growth

“We kind of have two businesses: our Click Forensics business and our marketing analytics business, which more that doubled last year,” Carey said. “We’ll continue to see strong retention and maintaining of our Click Forensics business and expect to see triple growth on our marketing analytics business.”

Adometry closed an $8 million round of funding in 2013, again from Austin Ventures, Shasta Ventures and Sierra Ventures, and added 100 employees. In September the company moved to larger quarters in the Lakewood Center Building II on Capital of Texas Highway.

The current total employee count is about 135. More growth is expected this year, although there are no plans at the moment to seek additional funding. That could change as the year evolves, Carey said.

If Adometry did want to raise more this year, Ball feels confident they wouldn’t have any trouble: “The good news is you already have three solid venture capital firms behind it. You’ve got a bunch of other later-stage venture investors who constantly call us about this company. It’s kind of the prototypical Austin company of software as a service with a team that we’ve worked with before that has figured out a really hard problem, and now it’s really scaling. If they needed more money, I’m sure we would be there; I’m sure a lot of people from the outside would fight very hard to invest.”

Market dominance, not profitability, is the company’s current priority. With the exception of Boston’s Visual IQ, there aren’t a lot of competitors to Adometry at the moment, but it won’t be this way for long.

“Like any successful company in a market, it’s going to get crowded over the next couple of years,” Carey said. “Once you have this kind of growth and success, other people start to poke their heads up and take interest. We’re super excited to be a leader and be successful. We’ll work hard to keep driving that and keep new competition at bay.”

Google has recently stepped up is analytics game, offering similar services to Google Analytics premium customers, which Carey sees as calling attention to the entire industry.

Editor’s note: This story originally appeared in Silicon Hills News’ print magazine which debuted at SXSW Interactive

idealAsset is Match.com for IP

By SUSAN LAHEY
Reporter with Silicon Hills News

Photo licensed from iStock Images

Photo licensed from iStock Images

Intellectual property should be a sexy asset to sell.

After all, you’re peddling pure potential: “Take this patent and make yourself a star…or at least solve some problem faster and more cheaply than you would have been able to yourself.” But in reality, IP sellers and buyers have to contend with a veritable ocean of patented ideas, many of which are worthless or irrelevant to what you’re doing. All of which are written in legalese so you can’t quickly ascertain what they do or how it might help you. And by the time a buyer and seller connect, the idea may be obsolete.

And if you’re someone with only a couple of patents to sell, fuggedaboudit.

The way IP has always been sold, as idealAsset CEO Tom Hochstatter says, is like trying to sell a house by leading with the concrete’s tensile strength. What the buyer wants to know is “How many bedrooms? How big is the kitchen?”

Photo licensed from iStock

Photo licensed from iStock

But Hochstatter’s new product, idealAsset, aims to change all that. His company calls it the Match.com for IP. Individuals or companies join and list their IP; idealAsset creates listings with more “buyer empathy,” matching the patented idea with what a buyer is looking for. Within moments, IP assets are matched to interested buyers. idealAsset doesn’t guarantee a marriage, but it gets the conversation going.

idealAsset is one of the companies pitching at the 2014 SXSW HATCH Pitch Competition.

Marketing IP Correctly

“IP licensing and commercialization is hard,” said Mike Millard, Director of Innovation, Seton Hospital/Ascension Healthcare. “It’s not like a widget. It’s a one relationship sale and just finding that person, even that part is hard…. idealAsset really cuts down on the research time needed to strike a deal. You want to get to the face time.”

“IP is usually commercialized by the top 10 percent of inventors,” said Courtney Landers, Director of IP, Calavista Software and previously VP of IP for Emergent Technologies—also an idealAsset customer. “For the most part, people in the industry don’t have a background in sales and marketing and don’t want to do the legwork to pick up the phone and make 100 calls to find out who might want this IP,” Landers said. And a broker takes 30-to-50 percent of the profit.

“I like the fact that I can put assets in there to scale and within minutes of loading them up with idealAsset, I’m sitting there with warm introductions to interested buyers,” Landers said. “I don’t know of any other tool that even comes close to that.”

idealAsset was incubated at Fluid Innovation, an IP brokerage started in 2005. When Hochstatter came on in 2007 with his tech background that includes Microsoft, IBM, Yahoo and a couple of startups, he suggested the company create tools and solutions for the IP commercialization industry, such as its licensing platform. idealAsset was one of the tools they conceived that will become its own company. Hochstatter likes to think of Fluid Innovation as an innovation accelerator.

“If we find another cool idea we might pull it into Fluid, fool around with it, incubate it for awhile and spin it out.”

Like Amazon for IP

“It takes almost an entire year to do an IP deal,” he said. “It’s hard and silly and there’s no good reason for it. It takes 347 days on average, if it ever gets done. It’s like pandas mating, and you really have to help them or it’s not going to happen.”

This is especially true for people with one or a few patents whose chances of finding a buyer and making a profit from their IP is miniscule. idealAsset offers a relatively fast, inexpensive alternative. Subscriptions range from $199 per person per month to $10,000 a month for an enterprise customer with unlimited access. Transaction fees range from 5 percent to 15 depending on your subscription level.

idealAsset also uses scrapers and crawlers to aggregate IP from companies that are not signed customers. If a buyer bites on one of these properties, idealAsset informs the owner of an interested buyer and invites it to become a member.

One of the huge benefits of idealAsset, Landers said, is that it provides a way for IP sellers to attach a reasonable value to the patents they’re trying to sell.

“More deals fall apart (at pricing) than anything,” Landers said. “With idealAsset if you’re looking for a technology you can start gathering a fair price point on the commercial data…. That’s a huge value…at the end of the day your IP really is worth what someone is willing to pay for it.”

But another benefit is the partnerships and ideas that may emerge from idealAsset. Being able to see various patents on the market may spark ideas.

“I’m an ideas advocate,” said Hochstatter. “I’m centered on the idea, not who owns it. I want to find the best home, the next place for that idea in that continuum…that’s my responsibility.”

Editor’s note: this article originally appeared in Silicon Hills News’ print magazine, which debuted at South by Southwest Interactive.

Austin-based Startup Burpy Delivers

By AMY MCCULLOUGH
Reporter with Silicon Hills News

Burpy-1Aseem Ali was a carless freshman at the University of Texas at Austin living in an apartment complex. When he could work around friends’ schedules and borrow cars to get to the grocery store, he could get fresh food and produce. But due to the inconvenience, he found himself eating a lot of Ramen noodles. And he got tired of it.

Thus, the seeds of online grocery delivery service Burpy.com, for which Ali now serves as CEO, were planted.

Burpy has had fast success: It officially launched in Austin in fall 2013 and will become profitable this quarter. Burpy also serves San Antonio, Dallas and Houston and plans to expand elsewhere in the Southern United States.

While Burpy has some Austin competitors, like Couch Potato and Munchy Mart, those services only offer convenience store products on wheels, while Burpy will bring you anything you can find at Costco, HEB, Wal-Mart and Whole Foods, including meat and fresh produce. In addition to groceries, Burpy also delivers products from Office Depot.

Ali, now a senior in mechanical engineering, said many of Burpy’s consistent customers are “elderly folk, young professionals—people that don’t have the time (to shop)–and working mothers.”

When Burpy began, it charged a delivery fee of $15 to $20. More than two months ago, the fee was dropped. Now, profits come from product markup. Customers can select items from more than one store with a minimum order requirement of $35 per store.

“Let’s say I order products from Costco and Whole Foods. If you order $35 from Costco and $35 from Whole Foods, there won’t be any charge,” Ali said. “We’re seeing a trend of more and more people coming back using the site. The biggest challenge (to getting customers) initially was when we did have a delivery fee. People were hesitant to pay a delivery fee and a markup. Now we only have a markup fee, and people are getting addicted.”

One satisfied downtown Austin customer recently praised the company in a Yelp review for the store and product variety it offers. “Jose A.” wrote on Feb. 2:

“We’ve used (Burpy) several times so far for delivery to our downtown office and have been very pleased. Drivers communicate status and ask you questions about substitutes via text/e-mail, and if there are delays, they’ll let you know. And we LOVE the fact that you aren’t limited to one particular store, or to a bunch of local, organic stuff (we do order that too, though) when someone wants Diet Coke!

“Growing pains? Maybe a few. I’ve noticed a few minor website glitches, but I know they’re a growing startup and have always listened to our feedback. It can only get better from here, and everyone in our office has become huge fans!”

Nationally, there are competitors more similar to Burpy: Instacart is an online grocery business that serves Boston, Chicago, D.C. and San Francisco, and FreshDirect serves New York City.

Ali said Burpy is able to be successful because of today’s technology. Many well-funded grocery startups failed in the 1990s because of pricey investments in infrastructure like delivery vehicles and warehouse space. Now, “everyone has a strong piece of technology in their back pockets now. Drivers have smart phones. … Whenever an order comes in, we send out texts to shoppers in an area with the order number, zip code, cost of delivery. There’s an accept or decline button. If they accept, a text comes with a link to shopping orders and delivery information.”

Burpy launched its beta version targeted at UT students in March 2013. During its official launch in Austin in September 2013, Burpy brought in $4,500 in revenue. The company has grown every month and will be profitable this quarter. They are on track to bring in more than $80,000 this month.

So far, the company has had only one investor—Azim Makanojiya—who has put $500,000 into Burpy. Ali and Makanojiya met threw a family connection, and like Ali, Makanojiya became an entrepreneur as a college student. While at the University of Houston, he first entered the e-commerce space in 2007, with wrist-band.com, a manufacturer of custom-made silicone wristbands. He now also serves as CEO of CorporateRecycles.com, which recycles and disposes of company IT appliances.

Makanojiya is not surprised at Burpy’s success and plans on participating in a Series A funding round that will likely occur this year.

“The hardest part about startups is actually grinding it out for a good year,” he said. “You lose motivation. A lot of roadblocks come your way—things you never even anticipated. … I always though if Burpy was actually executed correctly and done correctly, it would be a great success. … I think the execution was the big X factor in this business, and I think the team is doing a phenomenal job with that.”

In addition to Ali, Burpy’s management team comprises students who worked together in a UT Longhorn Startup class: CTO Sharez Prasla, CFO Safan Abdul, COO Alishah Momin and CMO Azim Momin.

In addition to finding more delivery drivers, a challenge for Burpy is finding the best payment platform for its employees. The company tried a direct-deposit method but dropped it due to the two-to-three-day transfer time. Burpy also tried prepaid VISA debit cards, but, like PayPal, the inherent fee structure made it unpopular with drivers. Burpy is currently working with Google Wallet, which provides about 80 percent of the features they want.

“I think technology in the next year or so will catch on and cater to these type of business product lines where there needs to be a platform where an instant transfer of funds can happen,” Makanojiya said.

Editor’s note: This story first appeared in the Silicon Hills News print magazine which debuted at SXSW Interactive.

The Austin Chamber Releases Hot Trends and Topics from SXSW

imgres-6Now that the madness of South by Southwest Interactive has subsided, it’s time to reflect on all the lessons learned from one of the world’s largest technology conferences.

And the good folks at the Austin Chamber of Commerce have been busy crunching numbers and making sense of all the data and talks at SXSW. The chamber’s Innovate Austin initiative partnered with W2O Group, a marketing firm, to provide key analysis of the Interactive festival which ran from March 7 through March 11.

“Austin prides itself on being cutting edge, we are continually reviewing our target sectors to align opportunities to better prepare for economic cycles,” Michele Skelding, Senior Vice President of Global Technology and Innovation at the Austin Chamber of Commerce, said in a statement. “During SXSW, Austin is at the center of creative and disruptive ideas. Through this initiative, our goal is to identify and cultivate these conversations and trends to drive strategies that will accelerate development through new talent, ideas and funding.”

One of the key findings was “more than 540,000 tweets were associated with the #SXSW hashtag around the world, peaking on Monday with 160,8881 unique mentions surrounding Edward Snowden’s session.”

And the analysis found that only 10 percent of “SXSW-related tweets originated in Austin with nearly four percent from New York City and more than three percent from San Francisco and Los Angeles, respectively.”

The event has definitely become a global stage with more London being the most active of 13 international cities analyzed, followed by Toronto, Paris, Vancouver, Singapore and Buenos Aires.

“The top trending topic was the relationship between national security and technology, driven by appearances by Edward Snowden (185,005 mentions) and Julian Assange (48,252 mentions),” according to the chamber. “Additional hot topics included wearable technology, 3-D printing, food innovation, mobile, and social business.”

For more information, visit the chamber’s site for a full analysis.

“The ideas that flow from SXSW shape what’s next in technology,” Bob Pearson, President, W2O Group, said in a news release. “Our partnership with the Austin Chamber enables us to utilize algorithms and cutting-edge software solutions to sort through what is important in Austin and share it with entrepreneurs wherever they may be. It’s our way of accelerating knowledge sharing from our city to yours.”

Phunware Lands $30 Million in Venture Capital

imgres-5Phunware announced that it has raised $26.25 million of a $30 million Series E funding led by Firsthand Technology Value Fund.
The Austin-based company expects to close its over-subscribed funding round within 60 days.
The latest funding round includes current investors Fraser McCombs Ventures, Maxima Ventures, Wild Basin Investment and the Central Texas Angel Network. It also includes new strategic investors Cisco and WWE.
Since its founding in 2009, Phunware has raised $43 million including the latest investment.
As part of the funding, Kevin Landis, Chairman and President of Firsthand, and Chase Fraser, Managing Partner of Fraser McCombs Capital, join Phunware’s board of directors.
Phunware had 2013 revenues of $22.1 million.
“The company currently supports more than 1 trillion annual transactions on its “multiscreen cloud platform” across nearly 190 countries and 10 languages,” according to a news release.
Phunware provides mobile development services for several top-tier customers including E! Entertainment Television, NBC Sports, WWE, NASCAR, CBS, Qualcomm, Edmunds, Jawbone, HomeAway, Turner, UHealth, Transamerica, King, Warner Brothers, AT&T and Adobe.
“We continue to have a very ambitious vision for Phunware – to enable our customers to engage, manage and monetize every connected device on Earth,” Alan S. Knitowski, Chairman, CEO and Co-Founder of Phunware, said in a news release. “We have achieved tremendous growth since inception and this new funding will further accelerate our MaaS platform investments and geographic reach in supporting the multiscreen goals and objectives of our brands’ anytime anywhere audiences globally. 50 billion devices will mean 50 billion opportunities … and we intend to touch them all.”

The Zebra Offers Insurance in Black and White

By JAIME NETZER
Reporter with Silicon Hills News

photo 2 (1)The word “disrupt” has become a start-up buzzword, but The Zebra COO and cofounder Joshua Dziabiak says it’s overused, and he’s not always sold when he hears it. “I don’t know if I ever really buy most of it,” he explains. But when Dziabiak, already the successful founder and CEO of ShowClix, saw Adam Lyons give the pitch for The Zebra, he was convinced. The venture, a digital auto insurance agency that lets consumers compare unbiased quotes in real time from more than 200 carriers, could do more than disrupt the insurance business: It could turn it on its head.

“The industry is ripe for a modern tool like The Zebra,” Dziabiak says. The mechanics are straightforward enough. The Zebra uses state insurance filing data to replicate insurance company models and estimate rates within a few dollars accuracy. “We were able to do something no one else has done before, by combining all of the different companies on one platform,” explains Adam Lyons, co-founder and CEO of the Austin-based company. The result is something new, too: transparency in the insurance industry.

Lyons and Dziabiak are both young, and the East Austin warehouse where The Zebra does its work boasts a mural on one wall and a buzzing energy that’s far from corporate. Though they’re selling insurance, which Dziabiak and Lyons say is a “stodgy, old, old money business,” The Zebra wants to inject a new set of descriptors to the conversation. “We want to throw ‘sexy’ into that,” Dziabiak says. “We want to throw ‘rebel,’ and ‘easy.’”

They explain that in 2014, consumers now expect to be able to make informed decisions about their purchases online, even from their phones. Sites like Kayak make this possible for air travel, but the insurance industry was missing an equivalent. Sites that claimed to, Lyons says, only compared a few, and still required consumers to fill out extensive questionnaires and provide contact information. “What happens is you get done, [the site] just says someone will contact you shortly,” Lyons says. “Then your phone gets blown up, your inbox gets flooded, and you never got anything.” As for companies like Geico? “Companies spend hundreds of millions of dollars marketing and saying you can go to their site and save, but that’s the equivalent of going directly to American Airlines and asking them to find you the best fare,” Lyons says.

unnamed-1The company has caught early attention from big name investors, including Mark Cuban, Austin’s Silverton Partners, and Simon Nixon, UK tech entrepreneur and owner of juggernaut comparison site Moneysupermarket.com. In Austin since last year, The Zebra held its national launch party in December of 2013. They’re now licensed in all 50 states—and D.C., too. Morgan Flager, Partner at Silverton Partners, says the ambition of The Zebra’s vision is part of what drew him to the company. “This is the company where, if they’re successful, it’s going to put Austin on the map,” Flager says. “It would become a consumer Internet town as well, and that would be pretty exciting.”

Early returns look good for The Zebra. Using the site, customer Chiko Barnabas Abengowe, who owns Perfect Staffing Solutions in Austin, found that he was overpaying on his car insurance by nearly $80. “I love it,” Abengowe says. “I love that it’s smooth, it’s easy, and I just like how it has the whole breakdown and compares other insurance right on there.” Abengowe adds that often employees will ask his company for auto insurance recommendations, and that he wouldn’t hesitate to send them to The Zebra. “I’ll definitely mention it if they’re looking,” he says.

With website traffic increasing, The Zebra is expanding, hiring insurance agents, a project manager, and software engineers. Find more at www.thezebra.com.

Funded in Austin…or Not at SXSW

By SUSAN LAHEY
Reporter with Silicon Hills News

Josh Kerr of Written, Cotter Cunningham of RetailMeNot and Utz Baldwin of Plum, photo by Susan Lahey

Josh Kerr of Written, Cotter Cunningham of RetailMeNot and Utz Baldwin of Plum, photo by Susan Lahey

In many ways, Written’s Josh Kerr was the poster child for how one gets funding in Austin at the Funded in Austin panel at SXSW Tuesday afternoon.

Kerr spoke glowingly of the help, support and advice he got from Capital Factory. He talked about building relationships with various angel investors over coffee, lunch or drinks until he gave them the ask. And he gave interesting tips: For example he suggested telling angels he’d love to have them invest even a small amount just to get them involved, and usually they upped the number because the investment he suggested seemed too small.

And the company wound up with $1 million seed round.

By contrast Utz Baldwin of Plum (formerly Ube) said finding funding for hardware like his lighting system that can be operated by your smart phone has found few Austin funders. It did, however, raise nearly $1 million on Fundable.

Finally, Cotter Cunningham of RetailMeNot explained that funding had been a little bit different for his company because his business model entailed buying existing businesses, which is an easier sell in some ways than getting funding for an idea alone. He got a $30 million round.

The panel, moderated by Shari Wynn Ressler, founder and CEO of Incubation Station, explored the process and hurdles of getting funding in Austin. All the panelists agreed that raising money is pretty much the CEO’s full time job, which can be a challenge.

For one thing, as Baldwin said, there were parts of developing the user experience he really wanted to get more involved with because it’s part of the business he enjoys. But he didn’t have time because he was busy raising money. Kerr said his team initially resented the fact that while they were doing the work of creating the company, he was wining and dining investors. Once he got the money though, they forgave him.

Beware the Soft Yes

“It was a little tricky with our model,” Cunningham said, “because it’s difficult to raise money and do an acquisition at the same time.” On the one hand were the funders doing their due diligence and collecting data and on the other were the selling businesses asking “Are we going to do this or aren’t we?”

Kerr said he kept the amount Written was asking for small, so that it looked like they were close to success. Then as more money came in, he upped the raise amount.

Cunningham and Kerr worked on building their networks, asking “Who do you know?” Baldwin wound up raising money from people he knew might be interested in the idea. After a ten minute phone call to a retired Cisco executive, for example, the exec gave him $150,000.

People who initially say no might change their minds if you make tweaks to the product that they suggest or if someone else takes the lead investment position, panelists said. Cunningham said “You have to be persistent. “Some of the people who gave us money told us ‘Until you called four times we weren’t paying attention.’”

But when making the ask, you have to know exactly how much money you want and exactly what you’re going to do with it. You also need to have practiced your pitch “a million times.” Cunningham said. And it’s best not to shoot for your most likely big funder on the early pitches. Practice on less likely candidates so you have it down when you’re shooting your big gun. That was a mistake Kerr made, going to Austin Ventures with his first pitch.

“In a matter of seconds I became uninvestible when they asked what we were doing with the money,” he said.

All the panelists experienced “the soft yes” which is not a definitive no but a “let’s keep talking” that never results in anything. Entrepreneurs need to guard against the emotional roller coaster of thinking a soft yes is the same as a yes.
Baldwin said that after his company won a People’s Choice award at DEMO, Sandhill Road (investor central in Silicon Valley) opened its doors to them. But one investor would say “You don’t want to be a hardware company, you want to be a software company” and another offered suggestions about the company’s business model. Baldwin was changing up the pitch deck after every meeting and he wound up with a garbled story.

“You have to nail that pitch. Exude absolute confidence in what you’re doing, demonstrate absolute domain knowledge and ask at every meeting if there are any red flags. ‘What do you see in this that would keep you from investing in my company?’”

Know Your Investor

While a hardware product like Plum’s, has trouble finding funding in Austin, the others talked about the difficulty of getting funding from outside Austin because investors often want to be able to keep a close eye on the companies they’ve invested in. But Cunningham said he’s had success pitching the benefits of Austin, such as a much lower attrition rate than that of Silicon Valley.

“In Palo Alto, most of the companies have a 20-to-25 percent turnover rate. Someone will be sitting in the office saying ‘I just got a call from Twitter and they’re willing to offer me 50 percent more than you’re paying me. In Austin that doesn’t happen. Our voluntary attrition is under five percent.”

Any form of investment takes a lot of investigation, panelists said. Friends and family may cough up the money but they’ll call every week and ask how their money is doing or require reports you wouldn’t normally have to generate, which is a time suck. There are numerous angels in Austin who go to all the meetings but invest very little. And there are some investors who are more trouble than they’re worth. It’s important to call their references and find out if they’re the kind who like to call you up at midnight with a question.

Entrepreneurs structure deals differently as well. Baldwin said his Fundable investors were happy with uncapped convertible notes and responded to discounts for early investors. Kerr, though, said all his early investors expected caps.
All the panelists said it was crucial to hire the best attorney available, not to scrimp or hire a relative. Kerr suggested finding an attorney who would work for equity.

At the end of the session, one audience participant asked where a new Austin startup could go to find more information about funding and Kerr recommended Capital Factory, which he had mentioned several times through the session. Claire England of Tech Ranch stood and asked a question, prefaced by the comment: “There are a lot of resources out there besides Capital Factory” to which Kerr responded that he wasn’t trying to be an advertisement for the incubator/accelerator.
Baldwin leaned over, looked at Kerr’s Capital Factory t-shirt and said “Nice shirt.”

Open Data Offers Huge Opportunity for Entrepreneurs

By SUSAN LAHEY
Reporter with Silicon Hills News

imgres-3Entrepreneurs are going to be the ones who shape the data revolution, but they’re going to face some weighty opposition from the legacy data holders. That was the conclusion of a lively, rapid-fire panel Tuesday morning at SXSW Interactive called “How to Capitalize on Open Data.”

The panel, assembled by Susan Strausberg, founder of 9W Search and previous founder of Edgar Online, included Aman Bhandari, global director of strategic alliances at Merck and a senior advisor to the U.S. Chief Technology Officer at the White House; data journalist Ashish Patel, founder of The DocGraph Journal; and moderated by Michael Atkin, managing director of the Enterprise Data Management Council.

Atkin started the conversation with a brief history of data, beginning with data tagging and keyword searching which “unshackled” data from previous formats such as spreadsheets. “This precisely defined the meaning of data as separate knowledge from format, from content.”

The next big breakthrough was OWL, the Web Ontology Language, which helped people understand the relations between data.

And now the data world is developing toward transparency, collaboration, paying for volume and paying for value. Consumer demand of data.

Atkin said venture funding in data was close to $2 billion. The trend is away from legacy systems—governments and industries like healthcare hoarding the data—and toward transparency. This provides a huge opportunity for entrepreneurs to capitalize on data analysis products.

But, as Strausberg pointed out, there are a lot of mistakes waiting in the opportunity in terms of making sure the data is accurate.

So the question, Atkin said, is “How do we deal with intersection of opportunity and chaos?”

“In the healthcare side, entrepreneurs are leading the way to solving the problem and making order out of chaos.”

From Silos to Open Data

Bandai, Strausberg, Patel and Atkin, photo by Susan Lahey

Bandai, Strausberg, Patel and Atkin, photo by Susan Lahey

When she came out with Edgar Online, Strausberg said, the reception was negative. “Accountants believe in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” she said. “They’re absolutely subjective about their own information.” Companies view the new, more open XBRL standards as a burden.

In healthcare, insurance and other industries where information was previously siloed, panelists said, it is now being shared. But neither those industries, nor the government, have quite figured out what the demand or proper use case for that data will be.

“When the Affordable Care Act was passed, there was no chief data officer at Medicare,” said Bhandari. “A year and a half after it passed, now there is a chief data officer. There are new animals in the kingdom that weren’t there before.” And that makes room for entrepreneurs. As Atkin said, we now have the capacity to do data science “on hardware you have at home.”

One of those opportunities, said Patel, comes from interoperability of data management systems. If a patient wants to move his medical records digitally from one medical facility to another with a different data model, it can’t be done.

In terms of a business model, Atkin said, “Data is a factor of input. You don’t make money on factors. You make money on creativity and innovation.”

Billing and healthcare records and patient care research, Bhandari said, are areas on the forefront of data management innovation.

Opportunities and Risks

Privacy is a factor, of course. When she was running Edgar Online, with millions of users getting alerts on the companies they were following, Strausberg said, only one person asked if they were protecting his privacy. Now privacy is a whole different issue, especially with the risks of criminals and cyberterrorists attacking network security. One audience member has an online prescription ordering firm and recently had a spate of people creating false doctor profiles and prescriptions. Since the company was small, it was able to identify and stop the problem quickly.

When she founded Edgar Online, Strausberg said, she and her husband were doing research on over-valued IPOS and learned that the Edgar system of tracking company information was going digitally. “It was something of Carnac (the Magnificent) moment.” Everyone in the supply chain had been involved in some way in creating the standard. “It seemed pretty clear to us that this was going to change Wall Street, everthing. We thought ‘There’s a pony there’ and we, being entrepreneurs are always undaunted by the fact that nobody else is doing something.”

The powers that be threatened to shut her down, as she expects other legacy data holders to do to entrepreneurs today. But they failed.

Data is going to get increasingly open but currently startups may have to get their foot in the door of the data holders by offering added value such as analytics.

As Bhandari said “There will never be a better time to be an entrepreneur in health care.

Lung Therapeutics Joins the Austin Technology Incubator

tN_87266_25th anniv logoLung Therapeutics announced Wednesday it has joined the the Austin Technology Incubator, part of the IC2 Institute at the University of Texas at Austin.
Lung Therapeutics joins ATI’s Bio/Health Sciences Portfolio.
“Lung Therapeutics Inc.’s lead drug candidate, LT1-01, will allow for effective fluid drainage of the lung cavity, a rare consequence of hospitalized pneumonia, without the need for surgery,” according to a news release. “The company has been awarded more than $12 million in NIH funding toward the development and IND-enabling studies of the lead candidate, as well as a seed investment from the UT Horizon Fund, a strategic venture fund of the University of Texas System.”
“Lung Therapeutics is unique as a pharmaceutical startup. The team has a wealth of experience in the respiratory disease field and the company has removed much of the technology risk by funding advanced translational research and manufacturing with substantial federal dollars. We are very pleased to admit them into the ATI portfolio,” Cindy WalkerPeach, PhD, Director, Bio/Health Sciences Portfolio at ATI, said in a news release.

Can a City Like Austin or Hackney Stay Cool Forever?

By SUSAN LAHEY
Reporter with Silicon Hills News

Fairs, Armstrong, Gibbs, Johns, photo by Susan Lahey

Fairs, Armstrong, Gibbs, Johns, photo by Susan Lahey

It was a lot like that old Sesame Street song “One of these things is not like the others,” when Kevin Johns, director of economic development for the City of Austin joined Londoners Marcus Fairs, editor-in-chief of Dezeen, Charles Armstrong, founder of co-working space The Tampery and Richard Gibbs, business development at HereEast, for a discussion at Hackney House about how space and environment shapes a startup and creative community.

The purpose of the conversation was to find out what births a place like the London borough of Hackney and the city of Austin, centers where artists, entrepreneurs and others who Richard Florida famously labeled “the creative class” convene.

Hackney, one of the poorest and most neglected and crime-ridden boroughs of London in past decades, had incredibly cheap rents that drew artists to an area called Shoreditch. They were followed by entrepreneurs who loved the low rents and collection of likeminded individuals. A number of these startups formed what they called the Silicon Roundabout and the English government renamed Tech City.

Moderator David Epstein of Gessler pointed out that there’s a certain romance, mystique and cool to the idea of startups that begin in a garage. But, he asked, what is it that makes something cool?

“I think it often comes down to luck,” said Marcus Fairs of Dezeen, architecture and design magazine in London. “There are clusters of vibrant human beings for reasons that can be put on a spreadsheet but nonetheless random things happen. The random genius can collect people around him.”

Armstrong, though, pointed out that a random collection of creative people need to be in fertile spaces that constantly change. “If you have a working environment where everything stays the same week after week month after month you can get stuck in your ways,” he said. “If your floor plans change, you change your walk routes. If there are new decorative items, new things to play with, people come in feeling that something’s going to be different this week that it was last week” and that creates innovation.

The reality, though, they pointed out, is that ‘cool’ keeps moving. And if a city or a startup or creative community doesn’t move with it, it will get left behind.

“I am reading these articles that Shoreditch is ‘over’” said Fairs. “You know…the battered sofa with the low tables and the guys working on their laptops. They move somewhere else. It’s the brutal cycle of fashion. The cost of things. Rising office rates…the price of accommodation is literally killing businesses.”

Historically, the group agreed, gentrification comes in and destroys what “cool” drew people to the area in the first place. But in the startup community, where being yourself and being authentic are paramount, that gentrification cycle could look very different. Startups, they acknowledged, often create spaces that “look like them” and that inspires innovation.

In the midst of this conversation, Johns rattled of a number of dollar figures about Austin’s economic success. He pointed out that any economic development Austin contemplates that’s a big investment is entered into UT’s revolutionary data visualization tool Stampede and specific ROI numbers are spit back out again, then rattled off several more numbers indicating that a rail system, for example, would have a very positive economic impact on the city. There’s some combination of data and serendipity that makes for cool.

Richard Gibbs who is in development for HereEast, an office and artistic development in Hackney, said the main thing people are looking for is where offices are “cool.” Because that’s where the talent wants to work. But in the process of creating such a center, the panel acknowledged, some of the sense of organic-ness and authenticity are lost.

But authenticity, Fairs said, isn’t something you can create.

“Hackney was a train wreck, now it’s the center of authenticity….Eindhoven (in the Netherlands) has an incredibly dynamic culture and it’s just a shithole. And Singapore is totally different and it has incredible creative things happening and it’s very expensive.”

Ultimately, the panel agreed, you can do extensive research, data collection, reconfiguring of space but a place’s “cool” partly just rests on its willingness to evolve and submit to the city’s natural lifestyle which may include parts of the city falling down, gentrification, displacement of populations and other uncomfortable realities.

As Fairs, said, it’s like the bumper sticker he saw recently: “Hackney was better when it was shit.”

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 SiliconHills

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑