The U.S. Senate today passed the JOBS Act, whose acronym stands for Jumpstart Our Business Startups, which includes a crowd funding provision to allow entrepreneurs to raise money directly from small investors through crowd funding sites.
The Senate passed the bill 73-26.
Now the legislation goes back to the House, which must vote on the amended version. The house passed the bill earlier this month in its previous form.
“Crowdfunding will allow small businesses to bypass Wall Street and go straight to Main Street for financing, freeing every American to invest in a local business or the next great idea,” U.S. Senator Scott Brown, (R-MA) who sponsored the Crowdfund Act provision, said in a news statement. Colorado Senator Michael Bennet (D) and Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) also sponsored the bill.
“Crowdfunding is an important way to harness potential investments in small businesses and start-ups in Colorado and across the country,” Bennet said in news statement. “This amendment will help bring our securities regulations into the 21st century while driving innovation, promoting job growth and supporting small businesses in a way we have not seen before.”
The bill allows entrepreneurs to raise up to $1 million per year through a Securities and Exchange Commission crowd funding portal. The amended Senate bill requires more disclosures from companies seeking to raise crowd source funds, including financial statements.
“The House bill would allow individual investors to invest up to $10,000, or 10 percent of their annual income a year, whichever is less. The Senate bill would limit those investments to the greater of $2,000, or 5 percent of either annual income or net worth, if either figure is less than $100,000,” according to the New York Times. “Investors with annual income or net worth of more than $100,000 could invest up to $100,000 or 10 percent of annual income, the Senate amendment states.”
The legislation is already spawning new startups focused on crowd funding.
On Wednesday, CrowdFund Securities, based in Dallas, launched. It’s accepting applications from entrepreneurs and investors and plans to offer crowd funding services as soon as its legal.
“We are excited about this explosive market and the promise it holds for needed capital for hundreds of thousands of start-ups, film producers and small companies nationwide,” David Marlett, an attorney, CPA and the site’s founder, said in a news release.
Arts-focused Kickstarter, which has raised more than $200 million for all kinds of projects in the past two years, is one of the most well known crowd funding sites in the United States. It does not allow companies to seek investors on its site. But several businesses have raised funds by pre-selling products under development on the site.
IndieGoGo and RocketHub also allow people to raise from funds online.
Category: Austin (Page 301 of 318)
Ok, this is a stretch for a technology blog.
But file this under what happens when old tech dies?
The Pay Phone Revival project plans to turn abandoned pay phone booths into interactive art objects. The project’s founders are seeking $5,915 on Kickstarter to complete its funding. If it meets its goal, the art installations will be on display from February through October of this year.
So far, they’ve raised $2,783 and they’ve still got 10 days to go. You can find out more about the project on Kickstarter.
The Senate is expected to vote on the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act or JOBS Act, today.
Among other things, the bill would allow small businesses to do crowd funding (on formats like Kickstarter) or sell up to $10,000 worth of stock to individuals. It would also allow small companies to publicly advertise for investors. The bill has garnered a lot of support among tech startup companies. Angel List, a social network of startup companies and investors, has heavily promoted the bill and has garnered 5,330 signatures on a petition delivered to Senators in favor of the legislation.
The Jobs Act passed the House earlier this month.
A number of prominent investors support the legislation including Steve Case, founder of America Online, and the National Venture Capital Association.
You can watch the debate and vote via C-Span live. You can read the complete details of the bill here.
BY SUSAN LAHEY
Special Contributor to Silicon Hills News

InfoChimp's Dean Cruse, VP Marketing, Winnie Hsia, Marketing Manager, Dhruv Bansal, CSO & Co-founder, Adam Seever, VP Engineering, Holly Wood, Office Manager, Huston Hoburg, Web Engineer, Joseph Kelly, CEO & Co-founder
Dhruv Bansal and Flip Kromer, two of Infochimps’ founders, were budding research scientists, graduate students at the Center for Nonlinear Dynamics at the University of Texas Physics Department. They had no real thought of building a startup. But it did occur to them that not only they, but lots of other people, had the daunting task of looking for answers in giant sets of data—Big Data. Data sets too big to be accessed by normal computers in normal time frames. Sets that require tons of storage and processing capacity.
Bansal, for example, had a school project that required him to laboriously collect and assimilate demographic information on five million students who had taken the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
Kromer understood Big Data not only as a scientist but as someone who held a degree in computer science.
So they suspected that the people who dealt in Big Data would rejoice if someone created a marketplace where you could find whatever chunk of Big Data you might need–like stock prices over the last 30 years or weather patterns over the last 100. They just couldn’t figure out how to monetize it.
“We didn’t perceive it to be a business project,” said Bansal. “It was just two graduate students building this service that would make our lives easier…but it was difficult to garner the resources needed to do this right. How do you get funding if you’re not planning to make money?”
Along came Joe Kelly, who responded to a Craigslist ad placed by Bansal and Kromer, seeking a developer for the physics department’s website. They didn’t hire Kelly. But he didn’t go away, either. Kelly was fascinated by chaos theory and data sets. Not a physicist, he had taken a year of business school, run a Chinese import company, an adventure travel company, and traveled around the Caribbean in a sailboat for three years. The way Bansal put it, Kelly kept bugging Bansal and Kromer, wanting to hang out with them and learn more about what they were working on. One day it dawned on them he might be just the guy to turn Infochimps from a graduate school project to a real business.
Now the guy who wasn’t quite up to par to build a website is the CEO.
Infochimps started as a data marketplace—a place you could sell all the data you compiled on coniferous plants of the Northern Hemisphere or incidences of actual injury involving slipping on a banana peel. It’s a place you could go to buy someone else’s research on geologic findings on a particular igneous rock.
In 2010, about a year after it started, Infochimps got $1.2 million in funding from venture capital firm, DFJ Mercury. This followed $375,000 in seed financing from angel investors. The company said it would use the money to increase the amount of data available to its customers. Currently it manages about 15,000 public and proprietary data sets for download and API access.
As a business model, Bansal said, that worked fine. But customers kept asking if Infochimps would help them turn their tidal waves of data into actionable information sets.
“A lot of our customers were saying ‘We already have too much data internally. We can’t handle it. We’d love to be able to take advantage of the data we have.” At first, Bansal said, they said no.
“Then we realized it was better to say ‘Yes.’ There’s immediate revenue.”
So, over the last several months, the company has been adding a whole new set of skills to its business model. It acquired Data Marketplace, a data company and Keepstream, that curated Tweet data. The second company was, Bansal said, a talent acquisition. It replaced its original CEO, attorney and co-founder Nick Ducoff, with Kelly in November 2011. When a company’s vision changes, Bansal said, everyone doesn’t see the future the same way. Ducoff and Infochimps “parted amicably” according to public reports.
And last month, Infochimps introduced its platform for helping customers use data more meaningfully. The company has developed specific tools: Ironfan for handling stack data; Wukong which simplifies Hadoop streaming; Swineherd, which runs scripts and workflows for file systems; and Wonderdog, a Hadoop interface for elastic search.
With these tools, Bansal said, and some customization, Infochimps can help companies of various sizes from multiple industries translate its Big Data into actionable information.
“Every major company I talk to is looking at ways to use Big Data technology to extract insights,” said Paul D’Arcy who is connected in the Austin Big Data community because of his role as executive director for America’s Marketing for Dell. But he’s offering his personal opinions here.
“None of them has the expertise to piece together open source technology to develop the components to do this. It takes time and investment…. Big data is one of the three or four biggest trends in technology right now and Infochimps is innovative in that they’ve built one of the first systems with all the pieces for organizations of any size to take advantage of all these technologies.”
One of Infochimp’s customers is Austin startup Black Locus, which provides pricing information on thousands or millions of products across retailers. The service helps retailers make adjustments to boost their place in the market.
Infochimps was able to speed Black Locus’s implementation of its service by months, as it does for many startups, Bansal said. Black Locus said Infochimps helps it help its customers.
“Infochimps provides us with a scalable infrastructure for dealing with the sheer quantities of data we collect and process,” said Trebor Carpenter, director of engineering for Black Locus. “This allows us the ability to focus on our core technology and algorithms. As trendy as Big Data has become, there are plenty of people claiming to be data scientists simply because they can correctly spell “hadoop.” But the Infochimps platform helps us transform a firehose of data into insight our customers can use to win in the marketplace.”
The percentage of companies that can really leverage their Big Data is tiny, Bansal said. But the number of companies that use it growing fast. Infochimps aims to help companies at all ends of the spectrum. Startups are a big target market because of Infochimps capacity to speed their process to market by months. But its prospective customer base is broad, especially with newer open stack technology that allows companies to get cloudlike technology from their computers.
“A lot of bigger companies started trying to solve their own data problems and came up with their own solutions and shot themselves in the foot,” Bansal said, referring to clients like the one that realized it was running more than 150 servers that weren’t producing anything.
Now everyone from Mom-and-Pop operations to giant corporations needs more efficient ways to pull valuable information from the giant, growing, waves of data being created through the internet, social media and other sources.
“When we first started,” Bansal said, “we had to explain what Big Data was. Now it’s everywhere.”
BY SUSAN LAHEY
Special Contributor to Silicon Hills News

From Funf left to right: Nadav Aharony, Alan Gardner, Cody Sumter From Ginger.io: Anmol Madan and Ryan Panchadsaram
Winners included the Funf Project in the News category; Ginger.io in the Health category; Vitzu Technologies in Innovative Web Technologies; Mobile, Condition One; Wemo Media in the Entertainment Technologies category and Thirst Labs in the social category. Brand Yourself won the Bootstrap award.
Winners—who were judged on creativity, viability, product and team–received $4,000, tickets to next year’s SXSW and a Swiss backpack to carry their gear when they return, among other things.
The categories and the local competitors in each category included News Related Technologies–Umbel, Social Media and Social Networking Technologies—Hoot.me and Scene Tap, Mobile Technologies—Toopher and Foreca.st, Innovative Web Technologies, Entertainment Technologies—Tugg Co., and Health Technologies.
Hoot.me and Umbel made it to the finals.
Michael Koetting of Hoot.me had just left the stage 10 minutes before the winners were announced.
“We just feel really privileged, really blessed we made it this far. We’re just waiting to see what happens. Regardless South By’s been an awesome experience for us.”
Of the 600 initial applicants the list was whittled down to 48 that were permitted to pitch in two minutes presentations on Monday. Tuesday, the 18 finalists each had five minutes to present, followed by a question and answer period.
Emcee Brad King, a professor of journalism and Emerging Media Initiative Fellow at Ball State University in Muncie, Indiana and former reporter and editor at Wired and MIT’s Technology Review has been at SXSW since its inception and has served four years as an emcee. He’s seen the quality of the Accelerator program improve over the years both in terms of the quality of companies and the caliber of judges who are able to share their expertise with participants.
“The quality of companies is improving as Chris (Valentine) and the group have understood health and innovative technologies and where the different segments are coming from. The three medical companies are amazing…it used to be easy to see that one was better than the others but this time the overall quality was really high.”
Part of the reason for that was the coaching done by volunteer coaches using a system devised by the Houston Technology Center Incubator. Greg Wright, Director of IT Acceleration for the center had a coaching system that Valentine chose to use across candidates, Wright said. In it, candidates do not send Wright and the other coaches their SXSW applications or other information. They only send their two minute and five minute pitches. That way, coaches have to respond only to the effectiveness of the pitch and can’t fill in the gaps mentally. They are helping participants prepare pitches with an audience of venture capitalists in mind.
“A lot of these founders are so familiar with their technology, their solution, they don’t know how to describe what it is. They’ll tell you it’s cloud based and interactive and mobile and you have to say ‘I have no idea what it is you do,’” Wright said. “The coaches really listen and reflect back ‘It sounds like what you’re doing is….”
“It’s important to make sure they describe what the problem is they’re solving and who has that problem. If we can relate to the problem, it’s often easy to appreciate it….. If it comes across like a marketing pitch we try to make it more authentic.”
Presenters can have several phone calls with their coaches to get ready for the presentation and they were “all over the board” Wright said. Some were bootstrapped, others had up to $5 million in investment funding.
Besides the high quality of companies, there’s a high caliber of judges who can offer deep insights to participants.
“Tim Draper (founder of Draper Fisher Jurvetson) can speak to things as an entrepreneur, as venture capitalist…people like Bob Metcalf (professor of innovation at the University of Texas) can give the panel really good feedback. It’s not ‘You should have a business model, it’s here are the four things that you should do to increase your presence in your industry.”
Months before the event, Houston Tech center got the idea to throw its own accelerator event at SXSW and within weeks of announcing it had nearly 100 participants from as far away as Finland for it’s HATCH accelerator competition. Ironically, Wright said, while it was worried that it hadn’t had time to properly publicize the event, it did manage to get an blurb in the SXSW Interactive calendar with a “read more” link that led only to a notation: #HATCH2012.
Nonetheless the event filled to capacity and beyond. Perhaps, Wright considers, having nothing but the hashtag indicated “If you don’t know about HATCH, you’re clearly not cool enough to be there.”
Wright and King both praised Valentine’s choice to keep all the startup activities in one Startup Village.
“Chris really worked to make the Hilton the epicenter of entrepreneurship. This is the first year and we’re seeing the fruits of that. The Hilton was just swarming with people…I’m imagining the Hilton being the place you book to stay if you’re a startup.”
The advantage to having so many tech startups in one place is multifold. For one thing, conversations can reach a higher level.
“You don’t have to say let me explain this…I don’t have to convince you that the web is important.”
Throughout the sessions, entrepreneurs expressed relief at having so many people who shared their experiences and at being validated in the competition.
As Alan Gardner of Funf put it: “It’s good to know we’re not crazy.”
And Cerealize, a site that allows people to make a customizable box of breakfast cereal, won the 2012 Startup Bus competition, according to this Fox Business News Story.
The Startup Bus Finalists were:
Bumper Crop (Florida)
Happstr (NYC)
Scoringo (Louisiana)
Gourmair (Stanford)
Adventeur (NYC)
Spott (Mexico)
Cerealize (SV)
Curious City (DC)
