First Lyft, Now Uber Launches in San Antonio

Founder Silicon Hills News

Photo courtesy of Lyft

Photo courtesy of Lyft

On March 21, Lyft, the riding sharing service, launched in San Antonio.

Last week, Police Chief William McManus held a press conference announcing that Lyft drivers would be arrested and issued the company a cease and desist order, according to the San Antonio Express-News.

Next, Mayor Julian Castro announced that the city should work with Lyft and other innovative startups looking to operate in San Antonio.

“We can make Lyft, Uber and similar services work in San Antonio,” Castro wrote in a post on Facebook. “They need to meet strong standards for safety and quality (insurance, driver background checks, etc.), but they should be part of the equation. Figuring that out will take some time, but we’ll get it done. San Antonio is moving forward, not standing still.”

And on Friday, another ride sharing service, Uber, launched.

“San Antonio, The road to get here has been long, and while we’re still working to break the mold of traditional ways of thinking, we’re proud and pumped to be launching in Alamo City,” according to a blog post. “As you may already know, we’re big fans of bringing innovative and efficient transportation options to the world and are thrilled that San Antonio now gets to embrace and enjoy the Uber lifestyle.”

Uber and Lyft are not available in Austin, which has banned ride sharing services. HeyRide launched in 2012 there and was shut down by the city and then acquired by Sidecar, another ride sharing app.

The taxi industry opposes the ride sharing apps because they say that they are not safe and that they do not do background checks on their drivers. But both Lyft and Uber state that they do background checks on their drivers.

But Lyft and Uber operate in dozens of cities around the country. They have been embraced by the collaborative community that sees ridesharing as a natural evolution of the transportation industry.


  1. Hopefully Uber and Lyft are so successful in San Antonio that Austin will have no choice but to change its rules and let those guys in. The lack of cab competition is just silly.

    • While I appreciate what Carma brings to the table (and I have an account with them), the types of trips that I tend to require motorized transportation to take aren’t commutes. So Carma does about as good a job at solving my particular issue as CapMetro…or not…I haven’t been able to use Carma, while I have actually taken the bus a few times.

      Put another way, Carma has its purpose. But it solves such a different problem vs. Uber and Lyft that it shouldn’t be mentioned in the same sentence, because all that does is confuse people. Sidecar’s latest business model (inspired by the late HeyRide if I recall correctly) is more similar, but still rather distant. But for the other two companies, you’d probably never use ’em for getting to and from work each day…and you’d be hard-pressed to use Carma for on-demand transportation. It’s almost like comparing public transit (Carma) to driving places (the ride-sharing-and-yes-I-know-it’s-a-misnomer trifecta). So you should ask SHN to write an article on y’all rather than commenting on something only tangentially related 🙂

  2. Someone should give us the phone numbers of the individuals blocking these services so we can call them at odd hours and request a ride since we can’t get the crappy cab companies to show up like we are paying them to.

Speak Your Mind